Artificial Intelligence has increasingly affected the educational scenario, and its careful assessment is more and more essential to avoid misuses and not fair exploitation on the part of the students. This paper provides a preliminary comparison between the performance of a very well-known Large Language Model, namely ChatGPT 3.5, and those of a cohort of students attending online courses about network and computer security in an online university. The analysis has been performed by considering both multiple-choice as well as open-ended questions and did not consider any form of fine-tuning nor contextualization for the training of the considered Large Language Model. The obtained results demonstrate a very good performance of ChatGPT 3.5 in answering the prompted questions on both courses and on both types of questions. Moreover, we have also analyzed some of the few hallucinations that took place whenever the overall context of the questions was very similar or even the same.

Comparative Evaluation of ChatGPT and Students in the Outcomes of Online Learning Courses Related to Security

Denaro, Francesco;Ducange, Pietro;Pecori, Riccardo
Data Curation
;
Tradigo, Giuseppe
Conceptualization
;
Veltri, Luca
2025-01-01

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has increasingly affected the educational scenario, and its careful assessment is more and more essential to avoid misuses and not fair exploitation on the part of the students. This paper provides a preliminary comparison between the performance of a very well-known Large Language Model, namely ChatGPT 3.5, and those of a cohort of students attending online courses about network and computer security in an online university. The analysis has been performed by considering both multiple-choice as well as open-ended questions and did not consider any form of fine-tuning nor contextualization for the training of the considered Large Language Model. The obtained results demonstrate a very good performance of ChatGPT 3.5 in answering the prompted questions on both courses and on both types of questions. Moreover, we have also analyzed some of the few hallucinations that took place whenever the overall context of the questions was very similar or even the same.
2025
Inglese
Pasquale Ardimento, Raffaele Di Fuccio, Giovanni Fulantelli, Pierpaolo Limone, Riccardo Pecori, Paolo Raviolo, Marco Rondonotti, Daniele Schicchi, Davide Taibi, Gianluca Zaza
Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online
contributo
2467
HELMETO 2024 - International Workshop on Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online
1
61
73
13
9783031940019
9783031940026
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-94002-6_5
Springer Nature
Comitato scientifico
September 2024
Rome, Italy
Internazionale
Generative AI, Large Language Models, ChatGPT, Network Security, Computer Security, Online Education, E-learning
no
none
Denaro, Francesco; Ducange, Pietro; Pecori, Riccardo; Tradigo, Giuseppe; Veltri, Luca
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
5
4 Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding)::4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11389/75095
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact