The various ways of applying Digital Storytelling (DST) in educational contexts have shown its qualities regarding the sharing of both cognitive and emotional contents. Although DST can be considered a personal and collective storytelling practice, perhaps it would be limiting to believe in DST only as a way of telling stories through digital tools. This article aims to provide a contribution to the debate in order to analyse the attitude towards DST as a support the participation of different social actors in a process of the continuous meaning-making necessary to understand the reality we are absorbed in and interact with. In particular, it is suggested to interpret DST in two ways: the first one thinks of DST as a technology of community, a paradigm that considers digital technologies as an oppor- tunity to facilitate the construction and development of relational bonds, assuming the perspective of community development as well. The second way considers DST as a third space for the negotiated construction of knowledge through the logics of non-formal learning.
Digital storytelling as a community and participatory dimension
Marangi M;Rondonotti M
2022-01-01
Abstract
The various ways of applying Digital Storytelling (DST) in educational contexts have shown its qualities regarding the sharing of both cognitive and emotional contents. Although DST can be considered a personal and collective storytelling practice, perhaps it would be limiting to believe in DST only as a way of telling stories through digital tools. This article aims to provide a contribution to the debate in order to analyse the attitude towards DST as a support the participation of different social actors in a process of the continuous meaning-making necessary to understand the reality we are absorbed in and interact with. In particular, it is suggested to interpret DST in two ways: the first one thinks of DST as a technology of community, a paradigm that considers digital technologies as an oppor- tunity to facilitate the construction and development of relational bonds, assuming the perspective of community development as well. The second way considers DST as a third space for the negotiated construction of knowledge through the logics of non-formal learning.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.