With digitalization, online reviews have become a crucial component of consumer decisions and are an important source of feedback on products and services. Users can make informed choices using online review systems such as e-commerce platforms, social media, and others. However, the collection and analysis of these reviews raises a number of questions regarding reliability, representativeness and accuracy. Since they directly influence users' choices, the methods used to aggregate review scores are extremely important. In this article, we explore the most common aggregation methods for rating online reviews on the Amazon platform, with a particular focus on the arithmetic mean. Although these methods are easy to implement, they do not always accurately reflect the overall quality of a product. We then critically analyze how more sophisticated approaches can minimize some of the limitations of the mean, such as the so-called recency bias; propose more robust solutions and alternative approaches that can provide a more accurate representation of the overall rating, improving the quality of aggregated ratings.

Comparison of aggregation methods used in online reviews: a critical analysis.

Olivieri M. G.
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

With digitalization, online reviews have become a crucial component of consumer decisions and are an important source of feedback on products and services. Users can make informed choices using online review systems such as e-commerce platforms, social media, and others. However, the collection and analysis of these reviews raises a number of questions regarding reliability, representativeness and accuracy. Since they directly influence users' choices, the methods used to aggregate review scores are extremely important. In this article, we explore the most common aggregation methods for rating online reviews on the Amazon platform, with a particular focus on the arithmetic mean. Although these methods are easy to implement, they do not always accurately reflect the overall quality of a product. We then critically analyze how more sophisticated approaches can minimize some of the limitations of the mean, such as the so-called recency bias; propose more robust solutions and alternative approaches that can provide a more accurate representation of the overall rating, improving the quality of aggregated ratings.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11389/74435
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact