The aim of this study was to: (1) determine directly the energy cost of shuttle running (CSh) and (2) compare it to the values indirectly estimated from kinematic data. CSh over distances of ≈10 or ≈20 m was determined on 65 subjects (group 1) from gas exchange measurements over 155 trials, or indirectly estimated on 10 subjects (group 2) from the time course of the speed as follows. (1) The cost to accelerate from zero to peak speed was estimated assuming a 25 % efficiency and added to that of constant-speed running, as obtained on subjects of group 1. (2) Since (i) accelerated running on flat terrain is equivalent to running uphill at constant speed, on a slope dictated by the forward acceleration (di Prampero et al. in J Exp Biol 208:2809-2816, 2005), and (ii) the energy cost of running uphill is known, CSh was obtained from the time course of the acceleration. CSh increased with the average speed, at any given speed being significantly greater for the shorter distances; e.g., at ≈4 m/s over 10 m, it amounted to ≈14 J/(kg m), i.e., 3.5-fold larger than that at constant speed. The two indirect methods yielded results not significantly different from CSh over the longer (≈20 m), but underestimated it over the shorter (≈10 m) distances. From our results, over ≈20 m CSh can be obtained with sufficient accuracy from actual measurements of peak speed alone, thus, greatly simplifying the experimental procedure. The so-obtained data can then be utilized to assess the athletic status of any subject, as well as to plan appropriate training strategies. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

The energy cost of shuttle running

Buglione, Antonio
;
2013-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to: (1) determine directly the energy cost of shuttle running (CSh) and (2) compare it to the values indirectly estimated from kinematic data. CSh over distances of ≈10 or ≈20 m was determined on 65 subjects (group 1) from gas exchange measurements over 155 trials, or indirectly estimated on 10 subjects (group 2) from the time course of the speed as follows. (1) The cost to accelerate from zero to peak speed was estimated assuming a 25 % efficiency and added to that of constant-speed running, as obtained on subjects of group 1. (2) Since (i) accelerated running on flat terrain is equivalent to running uphill at constant speed, on a slope dictated by the forward acceleration (di Prampero et al. in J Exp Biol 208:2809-2816, 2005), and (ii) the energy cost of running uphill is known, CSh was obtained from the time course of the acceleration. CSh increased with the average speed, at any given speed being significantly greater for the shorter distances; e.g., at ≈4 m/s over 10 m, it amounted to ≈14 J/(kg m), i.e., 3.5-fold larger than that at constant speed. The two indirect methods yielded results not significantly different from CSh over the longer (≈20 m), but underestimated it over the shorter (≈10 m) distances. From our results, over ≈20 m CSh can be obtained with sufficient accuracy from actual measurements of peak speed alone, thus, greatly simplifying the experimental procedure. The so-obtained data can then be utilized to assess the athletic status of any subject, as well as to plan appropriate training strategies. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11389/79730
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact