The purpose of this article is to show how the legal philosophy of young Leibniz, or at least the part of it concerning the theory and technique of argumentation, is compatible with a positivist position. In particular, the analysis will focus on the Disputatio de casibus perplexis in iure, a work that has received little attention in Italian legal literature, but which claims that a solution ex mero iure can be provided for each perplexing case.

Leibniz e l’interpretazione giuridica. Considerazioni sulla risoluzione dei casi “perplessi”

giacomo viggiani
2023-01-01

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show how the legal philosophy of young Leibniz, or at least the part of it concerning the theory and technique of argumentation, is compatible with a positivist position. In particular, the analysis will focus on the Disputatio de casibus perplexis in iure, a work that has received little attention in Italian legal literature, but which claims that a solution ex mero iure can be provided for each perplexing case.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11389/84696
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact